Send a brief note and we'll respond personally.
Before we install agents inside anyone else's firm, we run them inside our own. This is the live system - not a demo. Everything below is observable on a screen-share, and we're happy to show it.
Finding and contacting the right firms means researching companies, verifying who the decision-maker is, finding a real email address, checking whether we'd already contacted them, drafting outreach specific to each firm's situation, and running disciplined follow-up without dropping threads.
Done properly, it's hours of repetitive work every week. Done improperly, it's embarrassing - duplicate emails, wrong names, forgotten follow-ups.
That's exactly the category of work firms usually solve by hiring: an intake coordinator, a researcher, an admin. We solved it by deploying an AI agent instead.
The agent runs the full pipeline end-to-end - but every step has a rule about what it may do, and what it must hand to a human.
Given a target profile - industry, size, location, signals like active hiring - it sources candidate firms, identifies the named decision-maker, and verifies a real email address.
Before any firm enters a campaign, the agent checks our outreach system for prior contact - existing conversations, active sequences, past replies - and routes accordingly.
For each qualified lead it drafts outreach tailored to that firm's specific operational pain. The agent drafts and queues; a human reviews every batch before anything sends.
Approved sequences run automatically on a fixed cadence - and stop the moment someone replies. No thread is dropped, and no one gets chased after answering.
Escalates when unsure. Ambiguous cases - a bounced address, a lead with messy contact history, anything it isn't certain about - get flagged to a human rather than guessed at.
8 days live - 30 June to 7 July 2026.
From 81 researched across 4 market segments - each with a named decision-maker contact. Unverifiable leads were discarded, not guessed.
Firm-specific messaging tied to each firm's actual operational pain - no generic blasts.
Every message human-approved before sending, with automated follow-up that stops the moment someone replies.
The 25+ hours are an estimate for that first week - roughly 81 firms researched and verified at about 15 minutes each, plus campaign drafting and follow-up management, conservatively rounded. The equivalent human role - a part-time researcher or SDR - runs from about $2,000-3,000+ a month (a full-time SDR in the US averages ~$4,600). The agent runs for a fraction of that, doesn't take vacation, and never forgets a follow-up.
The agent only does what it's allowed to do. This is how we build every agent we deploy: scoped permissions, human checkpoints where they matter, and full visibility into what it's doing and why. Your client data would be treated the same way - under your control, inside boundaries you set.
Send email without approval. Every message a human signs off on, batch by batch.
Contact anyone mid-conversation. Active threads are off-limits to campaigns.
Invent contact information. Unverifiable leads get discarded, not guessed.
Ask when uncertain. Ambiguity gets escalated to a human, every time.
If your team spends hours on document collection, client intake, status updates, or any repetitive coordination work - an agent that works like an extra team member, scoped to one workflow, with your people only stepping in when judgment is actually needed.
Currently running a small number of pilots with professional services firms.
Thirty minutes. We'll walk you through the agent running our own outreach - the real system, real data, real checkpoints - and map which of your workflows the same pattern fits.
No deck. No demo environment. The live system, on screen.